You were expecting some sort of esoteric guide to hypnotically getting your tulpa under control? I'm afraid it doesn't work that way, if you have a corporeal mental illness like depression changing your perspective doesn't change that your brain is suffering, it only changes the ideas surrounding it.
I agree, it is my responsibility I only thought that this group could be an interesting I don't something
Like I don't know what is the problem with thinking I'm living a Holly war but I guess it's a good thing even if we can talk about it? And I can understand that it's all in my head, even if I can distinguish between real and not real it's not ok..
Well I guess you have one thing in this conversation that you can use and attach and that is the depression part and your just going to do that... cause you have no Idea what else to say
1:35 AM
Again it's fine
1:35 AM
I'm not mad or angry.. this was I guess educational
1:36 AM
Esoteric I don't know if you should use that word in this context
You have asked what I thought. And to be blunt, we see several people with mental issues come into the server all the time with similar ideas about what a tulpa is. You don't have a tulpa, tulpas are intentionally created.
If I'm being a dick Is because I do psychology thinking that the concept of mental illness has been used and is used as today to harm and create very very much violence on people... I'm sorry if I'm being you know aggressive, it's like don't use that word..it brings allot of pain and suffering against innocent people..
Furthermore, I don't actually know if you have depression, you are the one who said as much. Depression is incurable. But regardless what you describe is not a normal state of mind, and it's an actively negative one. If your description is wrong, by all means retract it.
There are particular answers to existence some are peculiar and harder to understand and can bring allot of pain, but.. it's not a reason to call it a .. not normal or things like that
Can you clarify this. How is it that this entity became what it is?
1:45 AM
You have deleted the former message so I don't know if you said something I missed but it seemed like you described it immediately as hostile.
1:46 AM
A tulpa is not hostile by default. You decide what they are from the get go.
1:46 AM
Debatably, you continue to decide what they are, forever. In a similar way as you do for yourself.
1:46 AM
Identities are just stories we tell to ourselves. They are ultimately, illusions.
Diogenes cursed
There are particular answers to existence some are peculiar and harder to understand and can bring allot of pain, but.. it's not a reason to call it a .. not normal or things like that
It is irrelevant whether such a thing is normal. Disorders are defined by their negativity relative to the norm. Not whether they are normal in and of themselves.
1:50 AM
It is both abnormal and negative to be at war with an identity in your own head, to the point where it causes you distress, even to the point of self harm.
1:51 AM
You're in a place of high abnormality in general, here.
It was not hostile in the beginning, it became hostile after I tried to get rid of it.
First of all, my friend, without being a dick..
Depressione Is curable, it depends on what line or what branch the doctor your working with follows, it depends on the method chosen by the psychologist or psychiatrist.
It's not only facts you know, it's not a hard science like physics..
Identities are illusions says who? When? Who is the influence behind this sentence? Where did you hear it ? Is a book? Is it a direct writing of a certain author? Is it an attempt by a student of the author to make the original more understandable? How much was it sacrifice?
What language..
I mean lot's of questions, saying... Identities are just stories... Again seems like an absolute meaning...I don't like absolute sentences.
High abnormality in general, here..
It's fine, I guess you are not wrong.
I just wanted some information about this topic from people who live this kind of things.
Mental illness is an options of course but I would like to create different lines of interpretations
Identities are illusions says who? When? Who is the influence behind this sentence? Where did you hear it ? Is a book? Is it a direct writing of a certain author? Is it an attempt by a student of the author to make the original more understandable? How much was it sacrifice?
There is no such thing as an identity in the brain, it is essentially a label applied to a state of being. Association/Dissociation in the brain is the physical mechanism behind such besides memory (which is visibly identity-agnostic), originating in the brain's data-handling centre which passes information between areas of the brain. It squelches some information, and associates with others. It does this all the time and in a thousand different ways, it does it when you're not thinking about the temperature of your body for instance. Identity-as-feeling is a variant on the same mechanism. Your brain does it anytime it runs "your" identity or any other, usually silencing or distancing ones it believes are not real.
Neurology begins to see how the brain operates, and we can see that consciousness in terms of identity simply doesn't exist, which is perhaps why we are able to generate other identities so simply. They're a core part of empathy - We do it regularly when we think about anyone else.
These are mechanisms that have been studied.
2:05 AM
To the counterpoint: Why do you think an identity is something concrete? Do you have some physical evidence to support that point? Because it's something people have tried to prove before and failed.
You are right insofar that we cannot concretely say such a mechanism doesn't exist for managing identity in the brain because it is a complex thing that we don't fully understand yet. However you should understand that defaulting to human-centric bias is flawed logic. This thing you accept as "identity" needs to have a basis in real data, just as my claim does.(edited)
Have been studied... indeed... By who? We don't know or care.. it's science god damm it and we don't question it.
Now I'm not going to put all this effort into copy and paste because I'm not desperate to be right...
Now.. the data...
What I am saying is ultimately not a tall claim: We do not see any area of the brain that handles identity. Identity seems to be an illusion created by the part of the brain that handles perspective and information thusly.
Again... Where did you get the info?
Have you made the necessary steps to get this data out? Is this your study? Is this your article?
How many subjects was the data based on ?
I want to see same result from Europe China and America
So what I'm getting from you is that you're going to question literally every position I make even though it's common knowledge. You've neither offerred a counter-argument nor have you made any attempt to make any sort of point by yourself other than to say "I'm making shit up". You're welcome to actually refute what I say at any time rather than say "lolno". I don't even require data, since I did not provide any myself.
You seem strongly up your own ass and are simply looking for any opportunity to discredit me for some unknown reason.
Look, this isn’t my argument to pick sides in, I’m just going to leave it to you two to settle out, but I really think you’ve made it a bigger deal than required